That's akin to saying that perl4 is not Perl.
To that end, perl1, perl2 or perl3 either.
I personally appreciate what you have to say, and you as a person, but your digging at perl6 is a bit ~disturbing~.
Why?
Is it a fear of Perlmonks being taken over? A fear of a job loss situation? I'm seriously curious, legitimately.
In reply to Re^2: Think Perl 6 (new book)
by stevieb
in thread Think Perl 6 (new book)
by pvaldes
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |