I'm trying to avoid analyzing the higher-level syntax just to tokenize it.
Apparently not, since you are trying ascribe meaning to function. That's the job of the parser, not the tokenizer.
In reply to Re^3: Is there a way to allow consecutive zero-length matches without using pos()?
by ikegami
in thread Is there a way to allow consecutive zero-length matches without using pos()?
by jsm
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |