You can improve by writing iterative version instead of recursive version. :)
Hi,
What is improved with an iterative version? Elegance?
In reply to Re^2: A more elegant way to filter a nested hash?
by Anonymous Monk
in thread A more elegant way to filter a nested hash?
by jimpudar
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |