... having tested this myself it is not what I see for foo. I see that foo.bak has the inode of the old foo. Are you sure of your result?

Well, maybe I was so tired that I didn't notice it was actually different. Here's what I got:

[j41r@work perl]$ rm alpha/foo.bak [j41r@work perl]$ stat -c%n:$'\t'%i alpha/foo* alpha/foo: 9353128 [j41r@work perl]$ perl -i.bak -pe 1 alpha/foo [j41r@work perl]$ stat -c%n:$'\t'%i alpha/foo* alpha/foo: 9353126 alpha/foo.bak: 9353128 [j41r@work perl]$ rm alpha/foo.bak [j41r@work perl]$ stat -c%n:$'\t'%i alpha/foo* alpha/foo: 9353126

Why did we get a different result than the one in file-dir-perms?


In reply to Re^2: How does rename() work on read-only files? by j41r
in thread How does rename() work on read-only files? by j41r

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":



  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.