goto &{"foo"}
Clearly has the form of a symref, and should be caught by strict -- but it's not. This was reported by me and mjd to p5p a while ago and it's an intentional exception to stricture. References: my report, mjd's report of nearly the same thing, the eventual explanation. The short version is that strict refs only applies to $%@* things, not &.
In reply to Re: Is this a symbolic reference?
by clintp
in thread Is this a symbolic reference?
by demerphq
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |