I often add cases of test data after __END__ or __DATA__ in scripts that use while(<>) loops --- and I used to always switch between <> and <DATA> for testing purposes (and usually forgot to switch back when done). I recall being quite happy a few years back when I realized ("Doh!") I could just leave the bare diamond op and run the script on the test data via perl -w < script.pl. Actually, I mostly test within the editor by sending the buffer to a filter of perl -w with output directed to another buffer, but its the same thing.
In reply to Re: (tye)Re: 'perl -p' ne 'cat'
by danger
in thread 'perl -p' ne 'cat'
by grinder
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |