No, for the reason cited above in this thread. The best you can do is generate representative strings. Methings japhy did something along these lines a while back, but da*ned if I can find it.
In reply to Re: generating strings from a regular expression
by dws
in thread generating strings from a regular expression
by indapa
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |