But this has nothing to do with signing modules. Or CPAN mirrors following some practise. Quality control is saying "this module rocks" and "that module sucks", but then in a polite and useful way.
That doesn't deal with the problem of authors uploading Foo::Bar version 1.0, getting great reviews, then creating many very subtle bugs in version 2.0. It also doesn't deal with mirrors that distribute sabotaged modules (matching the modules with a trusted site's MD5's does address it though).
I'm probably overanalyzing this though. I think a large part of CPAN's success has been its simplicity and open structure. Thanks for the replies :).
In reply to Re: Re: Perl Monks += TMTOWTDI
by Anonymous Monk
in thread Perl Monks += TMTOWTDI
by hacker
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |