Obviously you're talking about this gem. Is your problem that I considered the node for deletion, or that I considered it as "offensive?" If it's the latter, I apologize. Forget that I mentioned the word "offensive" ... that was only because that's what Mr. Muskrat put when he considered the same content almost a year ago, and it seemed as good a one-word reason as any. As it turns out, I don't find the node offensive, just really dumb.
So just pretend my reason for consideration is a little more accurate: something like "utter crap" or "mind-numbingly childish and puerile" or "didn't use strict" or "too much trailing whitespace" instead of "offensive." Maybe even "inappropriate?" The last thing I want to do is be labelled a censor just because I used the magic word "offensive."
Honestly,
Why is this appropriate for Perl Monks today (so far 3 votes to keep), when it wasn't the last time it was posted (5 votes for deletion, 0 for keep)?if ($you_are eq 'a policeman') { chomp (my $dick) or die (""); }
blokhead
In reply to Re: (parental advisory) It's just f-ing poetry
by blokhead
in thread (parental advisory) It's just f-ing poetry
by PodMaster
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |