Why on earth would your client trust you to install your code that others have not seen or had the opportunity to evaluate, but will not trust code that many thousands have seen, trust, and use every day?

If possible, just bundle the XML::Simple code with your code and move on to a real project with clients who have realistic expectations. Since you are asking the question that you've asked, it's highly unlikely that you will be able to meet the XML::Simple functionality without a ridiculous cost overhead that the client would be foolish to ignore.

If there are reasonable objections to refusing XML::Simple, I'm all ears.

Cheers,
Ovid

New address of my CGI Course.

In reply to Re: Parsing XML into a Hash by Ovid
in thread Parsing XML into a Hash by mcogan1966

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":


  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.