As I really (really!) think feedback on modules is needed I have started writing a bunch of reviews, (available on Module Reviews).
Need I mention that you should write about your favourite module? Especially if it isn't CGI.pm, which everybody knows and worships already.
In order to increase the usefulness of those reviews, I think they should include a word from the author, but also some kind of list of users, with their opinion on the quality and usefulness of the module.
I hope we can add this feature to the site, and here is a first proposal of what it could look like:
| User | Usage | Quality | Documentation | Support | Comments | ||||||||||||||
| Read docs | Tested | Rejected | Used | Used a lot | -- | - | + | ++ | -- | - | + | ++ | na | -- | - | + | ++ | ||
| mirod | X | X | X | X | I like it, some quirks but the developer is very helpful. I would have liked a tutorial though. | ||||||||||||||
| mirlyn | X | X | X | X | It sucks! Bill could do better. I told the author but he never answered. This code is dangerous! | ||||||||||||||
| KM | X | X | X | X | The module works fine but lacks some important features I need. I found that Super::Cool::Module is more appropriate for me. | ||||||||||||||
| Summary | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| Read docs | Tested | Rejected | Used | Used a lot | -- | - | + | ++ | -- | - | + | ++ | na | -- | - | + | ++ | ||
| Usage | Quality | Documentation | Support | ||||||||||||||||
Adding comments would be possible through a simple form, and voting guidelines available of course.
I am sure this could be improved, so what did I forget or what did I get completely wrong?
In reply to Module Reviews (again!) by mirod
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |