3. Are there any other (neater) implementations of my script above

In terms of the original problem as presented, I believe that it an alternate approach employing the exponentiation operator/functions would be more efficient and side-step the format conversion problems.

In Perl:

perl -le 'print $_, ": 0 to ", 2**$_ - 1 for 0..32'
In C:
#include <stdio.h> #include <math.h> int main (void) { int i; for (i = 0; i <= 32; i++) printf("%d: 0 to %.f\n", i, pow(2, i) - 1); return(0); }
Both implementations are capable of outputting ranges of unsigned integer numbers for up to 64 bits (untested beyond).

 

perl -le "print unpack'N', pack'B32', '00000000000000000000001010110011'"


In reply to Re: Integer overflow in Perl and C by rob_au
in thread Integer overflow in Perl and C by amrangaye

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":



  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.