My impression is that most of the OT nodes here are actually very restrained.
Mine too.
I don't quite understand why people seem to get so hot and bothered about "prevalent" OT nodes. If off-topic nodes were particularly common, or if many of them were blatantly spammy, then I'd be more symptathetic -- hell, I'd probably be in the vanguard of the charge to curtail them. But as it stands, we don't get very many OT nodes at all (as a SWAG, I think maybe two to five "OT-delete" considerations a week), and most of them are at least glancingly related (Javascript questions, for instance, as opposed to job postings or foobar-enlargement-pill adverts). I just don't think the "problem" is worth the effort it would take to "solve" it without causing more harm than good.
That said, I haven't really done a lot of research for this reply; I'm just going by my perceptions. Don't take my word for it! :-)
--
F
o
x
t
r
o
t
U
n
i
f
o
r
m
Found a typo in this node? /msg me
% man 3 strfry
In reply to Re^2: "Off Topic" nodes
by FoxtrotUniform
in thread "Off Topic" nodes
by CountZero
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |