That makes no sense to me, but I have a fuzzy definition of Perl's closures, so that may not be surprising.
The confusing part is this.
{ my $foo = 1; sub get_and_inc_foo { $foo++ } }
I was always told that get_and_inc_foo() is a closure over $foo. But, it's neither anonymous nor lexical, so how does that work?
If my example is a closure, then aren't all subroutines closures over the file-scoped lexicals in the file they're defined in?
(Now that I think of it, isn't this the reason why you cannot have globals when using ModRegistry?)
------
We are the carpenters and bricklayers of the Information Age.
Then there are Damian modules.... *sigh* ... that's not about being less-lazy -- that's about being on some really good drugs -- you know, there is no spoon. - flyingmoose
I shouldn't have to say this, but any code, unless otherwise stated, is untested
In reply to Re^5: Is it possible to create a sub exclusive to a sub? (nasty memory leak)
by dragonchild
in thread Is it possible to create a sub exclusive to a sub?
by punkish
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |