Does it make sense to anyone else that chomp tests and carps about receiving a read-only parameter, before it tests whether it would require modification?
C:\perl-5.8.6>perl -e"chomp( 'fred' )"
Can't modify constant item in chomp at -e line 1, at end of line
Execution of -e aborted due to compilation errors.
Obviously, it doesn't make much sense to chomp a constant, but if your operating within a sub, you don't know what the user will pass you.
chomp is conditional. If the user passes a constant that doesn't need chomping it would be nice to allow that through without having to duplicate the tests inherent in chomp?
Examine what is said, not who speaks.
Silence betokens consent.
Love the truth but pardon error.
Lingua non convalesco, consenesco et abolesco.
20050317 Edit by castaway: Changed title from 'A premature ejaculation?'
Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
Please read these before you post! —
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
- a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
| |
For: |
|
Use: |
| & | | & |
| < | | < |
| > | | > |
| [ | | [ |
| ] | | ] |
Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.