Any word on why it isn't a keyword? I mean in perl6 you no longer define your own new. So is there a reason new isn't a key word that triggers the contructor? Like I said before, I wouldn't use inderict object notation anywhere else, but in the case of new it hardly feels like a method, and you are acting on a class not an object. I wonder if not making new a keyword is some attempt at leaving the language dynamic.
Update: Thanks for clarification on all points to both chromatic and TimToadyIn reply to Re: No (ambiguous) Indirect Object Notation in Perl 6
by eric256
in thread Tim O'Reilly on Perl
by fauria
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |