I've pretty much given up on Haskell. It's fine if all you want to do is prove that your new variation of Fibonacci compiles okay, but if you want to actually see the output, forget it. Much less if you want to read your data from an external source.
In reply to Re^2: In need of a sequence iterator. (Haskell)
by BrowserUk
in thread In need of a sequence iterator.
by BrowserUk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |