Not "Simulation", since there is nothing like timing implementation, etc. What should fit would be object modelling, without people thinking about the programming subject "OO modelling".
'Tree::Model' ?
In retrospect, this is too large. I should have written a sub-level of CPAN packages and used them for the implementation. (Say, the object keeper with serialization, etc, should have gone to CPAN as a module first and then I could have use:d that.)
In reply to Re^6: Rather WeirdDataModeller
by BerntB
in thread What should I name my module?
by BerntB
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |