I have seen the inconsistency as well, [...]Having read the docs tye pointed out, I concluded it is on purpose the way it is
If you mean that you think that showing "-2 (+0 -2)" and then later, due to additional votes, showing "-1 (+0 -1)" is intentional, then you would have misunderstood the documentation that I linked to (and didn't understand my earlier reply in this thread either).
I think ambrus has hit on the most likely explanation ("stale" browser cache -- a mostly good thing, IMHO, except that sometimes the viewer doesn't recognize that the displayed content is slightly "stale").
- tye
In reply to Re^2: Error in the reputation breakdown field? (conclusions)
by tye
in thread Error in the reputation breakdown field?
by Moron
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |