<li> tags don't have to be closed in HTML so why bother?
That's a booboo on my part. I'm thinking XHTML and everything needs to be closed properly. It's a good habit to get into (which I don't always bother with). Allowing optional end tags is stupidity, but quite valid in regular HTML.
Would you critise a Perl book for using $_ ?
What? You're comparing cheese and Wednesday here. The only way I can see what you're meaning is to assume that you're pointing out that both are valid. Other than that, I have no clue as to your point. Thanks for pointing out my initial error, though.

Cheers,
Ovid

Join the Perlmonks Setiathome Group or just click on the the link and check out our stats.

In reply to (Ovid) Re(2): Perl and CGI for the World Wide Web by Ovid
in thread Perl and CGI for the World Wide Web by Ovid

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":


  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.