Still, my first sentence is valid (∃!~/\w/), but you're saying that's not enough for identifiers rule... but I was not intended to say that I am rediscovering identifier regexp!
:)
In reply to Re^6: A sub named ∃
by vkon
in thread A sub named ∃
by diotalevi
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |