With the assumption that the pattern suggested by olus is applicable to your real record format, I ran a quick test for the other part of your question -- how long this might take.
On my modest hardware (Intel Core 2 6600), 10 million records took about 37 seconds to process. Assuming a reasonable overhead from other operations, there should be no problem keeping within the time constraints.
In reply to Re: Seeking an Enlightened Path (Parsing, Translating, Translocating)
by igelkott
in thread Seeking an Enlightened Path (Parsing, Translating, Translocating)
by nanotasher
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |