davido and pary, thanks. davido you're correct...I was checking not so much on the validity of a single entry class (I know it's legal). I was just curious about why a programmer might want to have a single character class. pary made me think and realize, much like you're note of the negated class, that there are meta-character situations where a single entry could be usefule, too.
Thanks to you both. I appreciate your insights.
In reply to Re^4: Why would one want in a regex a class with only a single entry?
by ack
in thread Why would one want in a regex a class with only a single entry?
by ack
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |