I think of myself as a moderately good developer. I have a reasonable
amount of experience, I know about common patterns, I reuse code when possible,
I try to follow good development practice.
I use test-driven development, I religiously use a revision control systsem.
I use Devel::Cover to check that my tests cover 100% of the code I
write. Likewise, I ensure that I have good Pod::Coverage.
I've done informal code reviews before -- at many of my clients, my
co-workers disdained code review, so I found ways to do it "on the sly": "Hey,
I'm not sure about this module, would you look at it with me?"
Now, though, I have an opportunity to do more structured and formal code
review. I don't want to bury the process in formality and paperwork, but it is
important that I can point a manager at documentation and say "yep, I
really did code reviews, here's the proof".
Can the members of the Monestary suggest:
- Ground rules for having useful code reviews
- Ideas for what kinds of documentation I should have to prove they've been
done
- Any other information about conducting semi-formal code reviews in a way
that's really useful for developing (esp. in Perl).
I'd certainly benefit from the experience of my esteemed brothers and sisters.
<–radiant.matrix–>
Ramblings and references
“A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.” — Herm Albright
I haven't found a problem yet that can't be solved by a well-placed trebuchet
Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
Please read these before you post! —
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
- a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
| |
For: |
|
Use: |
| & | | & |
| < | | < |
| > | | > |
| [ | | [ |
| ] | | ] |
Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.