I have a (somewhat esoteric) question about the usage of local in the context of the special form goto &SUB. Here is my example code:
Running this program produces the following output:use strict; use warnings; use Data::Dumper; sub s1 { print "Second: ",Dumper(@SomePackage::_data),"\n"; } sub s0 { local @SomePackage::_data=(45,'D'); print "First: ",Dumper(@SomePackage::_data),"\n"; goto &s1; } s0
I do not understand why @SomePackage::_data is empty within s1.First: $VAR1 = 45; $VAR2 = 'D'; Second:
My understanding of local is that it creates a new copy of _data, which shadows the previous one until the end of the current sub. This new copy of _data is visible in this subroutine and all subs called from this one (unless, of course, shadowed by a new local declaration.
My understanding of goto &s1 is that control is transfered to the subroutine s1 without any change in the stack.
Therefore, since _data is non-empty within s0, it should be non-empty within s1. Where do I make a mistake here?
In reply to goto &sub and local question by rovf
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |