The code you have posted above is identical to the code you posted first? Maybe its a mistake on my part.
In reply to Re^3: Is there a more efficient way?
by mzedeler
in thread Is there a more efficient way?
by lomSpace
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |