I'm not sure anyone who's ever used Smalltalk would use the phrase "normal math infix operators", as Smalltalk has no operator precedence, not even for "normal math infix operators".
I suppose that's an example of making the language easier to parse at the expense of humans, though. (What a useless false dilemma that is; I had a lovely discussion with Adin Falkoff a couple of years ago about teaching APL to inner-city students in the '60s. I asked him specifically about operator precedence and the like, and his approach was very different from that of Alan Kay, Dan Ingalls, et al.)
In reply to Re^4: What are the drawbacks of autobox?
by chromatic
in thread What are the drawbacks of autobox?
by LanX
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |