What I'm really curious about, is the need for the Empty package. If I substitute the Empty for Moose directly I get the error:
You want Moose::Object, not Moose.
In reply to Re: Moose::Meta::Class needs a package?
by stvn
in thread Moose::Meta::Class needs a package?
by Boldra
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |