Do you mean: why isn't constant-folding applied to x?
It is odd that it doesn't. Maybe its weird «( EXPR ) x EXPR» syntax interferes? I doubt it, though. It was probably just overlooked.
In reply to Re: Why is const x const not a const?
by ikegami
in thread Why is const x const not a const?
by PerlGrey
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |