in reply to Re^4: CP6AN should be a database
in thread Notion: CP6AN <strike>should</strike> could be a database

Remember this, though: just because a record in the database says there is a version 1.2 doesn't mean it actually exists.

The database can store a field it calls a "version number", but that doesn't enforce anything on reality.

I would like to simultaneously store different versions of the same module (I'm looking at you, CGI.pm!), but that's not a issue that a database record will fix. We still have to have some way to store it. Once we have that, we'll be able to figure out which version to get even without a database.

So, I don't see how the database is doing anything special here, or adding value. I certainly don't think it is doing any "versioning", in any context.

--
brian d foy <brian@stonehenge.com>

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^6: CP6AN should be a database
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Apr 09, 2005 at 09:43 UTC
    Remember this, though: just because a record in the database says there is a version 1.2 doesn't mean it actually exists.

    Sorry? Isn't that just the same as saying "A file that looks like a perl module with version 1.2 may exist in the filesystem, but it could contain COBOL."


    Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
    Lingua non convalesco, consenesco et abolesco.
    Rule 1 has a caveat! -- Who broke the cabal?