Is this the correct address?

No, I wanted to leave and remove all data I had entered onto this site because I realised it was going to be a tremendous uphill struggle to get people to realise that aXML does infact work, and is infact awesome, when they don't want it to work and they want me to be a troll that they can abuse.

Leaving seemed easier than arguing, but since TPTB on this site absolutely refuse to allow me to leave gracefully, and I absolutely refuse to leave behind a record of failure to prove my ideas when I know them to be correct, we have the situation where my only remaining option is to just put up with the abuse I receive here until my case is proven, at which point the whole game changes, flips on its head, as it will be seen that I was right all along, and the every single fucker that was rude and nasty to me was wrong, and ought to be ashamed of themselves.

Oh how I wish you had guts enough to use a proper account to make your stupid little comments with; then when your finally proven wrong people will know what an idiot you are.

Orly?

Re^2: H.O.P && aXML by Logicus on Jul 19, 2011 at 12:43 UTC

It's totally illogical trying to compare aXML and TT2!

aXML vs TT2 by Logicus on Oct 21, 2011 at 03:39 UTC

Yah rly.

aXML (the grammar definition) + a set of definition plugins (the syntax) = a language.

It's not logical to compare aXML and TT2, any more than it is to compare Perl and TT2, however for the purposes of illustration a comparison of them does help a bit in explaining the rules of aXML in a way that is accessible to users of TT2.

aXML is not a replacement to TT2, infact, you could if you so desired, replace the standard set of aXML plugins with ones which output TT2 template code. Then aXML could generate TT2 templates for you, or catalyst apps, or mojolicious programs... whatever really.

aXML is more concerned with controlling server behaviour in a declaritive manner than browser behaviour, but having said that it's perfectly capable of doing both, and unless there is a really good reason for using TT2 then there is no need as aXML is more than adequetly capable of replicating the html/xml output templating functions of TT2.

What your looking at is the emergence of a new paradigm, still in its infancy yes, but a clearly different way of doing things which has various strong advantages over older methods (at the expense of processor time).

If you actually do want to understand what it is, instead of just wanting to be difficult, then I suggest that when PerlNights opens in the near future, you click on the "Castle Blueprints" section and download the full source code, which with any luck will be sufficient for most people to understand just what it is about aXML that drives me to continue pursuing it at the expense of my whole career.

Programmers, especially perl programmers earn upwards of £30,000 p/a, which conservatively speaking means I have currently invested around £150,000 of my time into the project so far. And I'm giving it away for free to a bunch of people who don't like me and call me a delusional arrogant troll.

I must be flipping mental...