in reply to Array of arrays
Good luck!
Update: Hmm, only saw one problem and ignored the rest. Guess I was just after first post! ;) I still think dereferencing before accessing is better style (I had no idea it was optional for an array with 2 depth). Apologies, reading perllol now.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re: Re: Array of arrays
by Fastolfe (Vicar) on Jan 22, 2001 at 09:54 UTC | |
|
Re: Re: Array of arrays
by arhuman (Vicar) on Jan 22, 2001 at 18:00 UTC | |
by mwp (Hermit) on Jan 22, 2001 at 18:19 UTC | |
by chipmunk (Parson) on Jan 22, 2001 at 20:00 UTC | |
|
Re: Re: Array of arrays
by cajun (Chaplain) on Jan 22, 2001 at 09:54 UTC |