in reply to Re: perl oo
in thread perl oo
If you want an instance method called "new", I have no idea what it's doing. If you want to clone an object, call your instance method "clone" or "copy". If you want to provide a new empty object of the same class as an existing object, just use:
my $sibling = (ref $original)->new(...);
There is no point in putting that ref-ish crap in something called "new". In fact, it's misleading.
Note that I'm not arguing that every method should be either a class method, or an instance method, but not both. Rather, I'm saying that "new" on an instance could mean either "clone" or "make new one like...", and thus you are confusing at least half your audience, guaranteed.
Yes, there are other prominent members of the Perl community who disagree with me on this. Ask them if they were programming in Smalltalk in 1980. {grin}
I consider any use of this ref($proto) || $proto in new to be "cargo cult programming", and mark it off as such in the code reviews I do.
-- Randal L. Schwartz, Perl hacker
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re: ref($proto) - just say no!
by mr.nick (Chaplain) on Jan 16, 2001 at 06:30 UTC | |
by coreolyn (Parson) on Jan 17, 2001 at 01:18 UTC |