Re^3: Does something like Pod::Coverage::Moose exist for Moo?

You may have missed my point. You don't need to borrow stuff from Pod::Coverage::Moose, because Pod::Coverage::Moose already seems to support Moo classes and roles.

Just use Pod::Coverage::Moose as-is, but put the tests in your xt directory instead of t. That way, MakeMaker (or whatever you're using to package your distribution) should find and run the test while it's building the distribution tarball, but the test will not automatically run on end users' systems.

perl -E'sub Monkey::do{say$_,for@_,do{($monkey=[caller(0)]->[3])=~s{::}{ }and$monkey}}"Monkey say"->Monkey::do'

Comment on Re^3: Does something like Pod::Coverage::Moose exist for Moo? Select or Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Does something like Pod::Coverage::Moose exist for Moo? by jds17 (Pilgrim) on Oct 25, 2012 at 07:50 UTC
Oh, I really have missed your point. It's the first time I want to publish a module so this packaging question did not turn up before. I will try to use Pod::Coverage::Moose and put the author tests in xt. I found a nice description of handling author tests when using Module::Build here: http://elliotlovesperl.com/2009/11/24/explicitly-running-author-tests. Thank you for putting me on the right track!	[reply]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^4: Does something like Pod::Coverage::Moose exist for Moo?
by jds17 (Pilgrim) on Oct 25, 2012 at 07:50 UTC

Oh, I really have missed your point. It's the first time I want to publish a module so this packaging question did not turn up before.

I will try to use Pod::Coverage::Moose and put the author tests in xt. I found a nice description of handling author tests when using Module::Build here: http://elliotlovesperl.com/2009/11/24/explicitly-running-author-tests. Thank you for putting me on the right track!

[reply]