Re^4: How fast is pp/PAR::Packer at packing DateTime::Format::ISO8601 for you?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: How fast is pp/PAR::Packer at packing DateTime::Format::ISO8601 for you? by Anonymous Monk on May 19, 2013 at 03:43 UTC
FWIW, I am the OP, and this was a (part of a) bug that was fixed, see http://search.cpan.org/dist/Module-ScanDeps/Changes, Bug #80276 for Module-ScanDeps: Module DateTime::Format::ISO8601 generates error after being packaged It now runs pretty fast :) `$ perl -le " print ~~gmtime " Sun May 19 03:37:08 2013 $ pp -e " use strict; use warnings; use Getopt::Long; use DateTime::Fo +rmat::ISO8601; print qq{$_\n} for %INC; " $ perl -le " print ~~gmtime " Sun May 19 03:37:24 2013` [download] This is with PAR Packager, version 1.014 (PAR version 1.007) and Module::Scandeps 1.10 So if you're experiencing slowdown, upgrade :)	[reply] [d/l]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^5: How fast is pp/PAR::Packer at packing DateTime::Format::ISO8601 for you?
by Anonymous Monk on May 19, 2013 at 03:43 UTC

http://search.cpan.org/dist/Module-ScanDeps/Changes

Bug #80276 for Module-ScanDeps: Module DateTime::Format::ISO8601 generates error after being packaged

It now runs pretty fast :)

$ perl -le " print ~~gmtime "
Sun May 19 03:37:08 2013

$ pp -e " use strict; use warnings; use Getopt::Long; use DateTime::Fo
+rmat::ISO8601; print qq{$_\n} for %INC; "

$ perl -le " print ~~gmtime "
Sun May 19 03:37:24 2013
[download]

This is with PAR Packager, version 1.014 (PAR version 1.007) and Module::Scandeps 1.10

So if you're experiencing slowdown, upgrade :)

[reply]
[d/l]