in reply to Re^2: Testing for readdir failure (Perl-bug)
in thread Testing for readdir failure

yes, but did you notice:

------ Error: on --- Reset: off $! 17: File exists

I included all cases for completeness and to make it easier to find the bug.

Maybe this is clearer:

DB<105> $!=666 => "Unknown error 666" DB<106> $!=666;scalar readdir X or warn "$!\n" Unknown error 666 DB<107> $!=undef;scalar readdir X or warn "$!\n" Bad file descriptor

As you can see $! needs to be reset in advance "to be meaningful".

Cheers Rolf

( addicted to the Perl Programming Language)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Testing for readdir failure (perlbug errno test without localizing)
by Anonymous Monk on May 26, 2013 at 00:20 UTC

    As you can see $! needs to be reset in advance "to be meaningful".

    Yup, logic bug is logic bug :)

    Compare Perl_do_close (called by pp_close ie close ) to pp_readdir

    pp_readdir test errno without localizing, do_close doesn't test errno at all

    closedir has this issue, and probably many others, maybe 40 others

    I wouldn't be surprised if other functions testing errno have this issue too -- this needs explicit testing / reviewing / patching

      > closedir has this issue, and probably many others, maybe 40 others

      well at least readline, but now setting to undef doesn't help here.

      Additionally I couldn't figure out why readdir sometimes throws warnings and sometimes not.

      I already prepared a bug report and will send it tomorrow.

      Cheers Rolf

      ( addicted to the Perl Programming Language)

      I have practically no knowledge of C nor Perl's C code, so could you describe the effect(s) of this logic bug at the Perl level?