Re^4: Should I list core modules as dependencies?

I don't remember seeing any wishlist items bug reports about someone wanting non-core dependencies hilighted

Why report wishlist of you can just edit your makefile/build.pl ?

OTOH, scandeps doesnt list core modules by default

I tested, it claims it does not, but it does (it reported base, Carp, Encode, List::Util for me) However seems it doesnt list non-dual-life modules.

Comment on Re^4: Should I list core modules as dependencies?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: Should I list core modules as dependencies? by Anonymous Monk on Jun 03, 2013 at 04:43 UTC
Why report wishlist of you can just edit your makefile/build.pl ? You said None of CPAN tools can clearly show that module use just a few non-Core dependencies, and instead shows long-long tail of core modules and testing modules. You said , these things don't have this feature I want, so I prefer to see make incomplete Makefile.PL/Build.PL How is editing Makefile.PL/Build.PL so it becomes incomplete, preferable to improving "CPAN tools to clearly show that module use just a few non-Core dependencies"? So instead of fixing one or two or three tools , to ease fears of dependencies, you prefer incomplete Build.PL/Makefile.PL? incredible	[reply]
Re^6: Should I list core modules as dependencies? by vsespb (Chaplain) on Jun 03, 2013 at 07:18 UTC
http://www.perlmonks.org/?node_id=1036600 But in general, I don't submit feature request usually. I prefer bug reports.	[reply]