in reply to Re^8: using the power of consideration responsibly (what is personal attack what is trolling, can you lose power to consider)
in thread using the power of consideration responsibly (what is personal attack what is trolling, can you lose power to consider)
Since the consideration system is not broken, or not even considered a problem by the Monastery, I tend to go by the "Don't repair it, if it ain't broken" maxim.
Allow me to ask you a more personal question: you seem genuinely interested in the good working of the Monastery. Why don't you join us and post under your own identity?
CountZero
A program should be light and agile, its subroutines connected like a string of pearls. The spirit and intent of the program should be retained throughout. There should be neither too little or too much, neither needless loops nor useless variables, neither lack of structure nor overwhelming rigidity." - The Tao of Programming, 4.1 - Geoffrey James
My blog: Imperial Deltronics
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^10: using the power of consideration responsibly (what is personal attack what is trolling, can you lose power to consider)
by Anonymous Monk on Jun 08, 2013 at 11:27 UTC | |