Re^4: Plea for upvotes.

I guess I said too much.

You said a lot, but it was small in content.

At least I don't understand the problem. You have posted the above message from your BrowserUK account, so what is exactly the problem?

CountZero

A program should be light and agile, its subroutines connected like a string of pearls. The spirit and intent of the program should be retained throughout. There should be neither too little or too much, neither needless loops nor useless variables, neither lack of structure nor overwhelming rigidity." - The Tao of Programming, 4.1 - Geoffrey James

My blog: Imperial Deltronics

Comment on Re^4: Plea for upvotes.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: Plea for upvotes. by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Sep 03, 2013 at 06:02 UTC
so what is exactly the problem? That should be "so what was exactly the problem?". With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday' Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error. "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.	[reply]
Re^6: Plea for upvotes. by CountZero (Bishop) on Sep 03, 2013 at 06:10 UTC
Ah, good to hear the problem has gone away / was set right / debugged. Welcome back BrowserUK and may we keep on learning from you ever-lasting quest to squeeze the last bit of performance out of our dear ol' Perl. CountZero A program should be light and agile, its subroutines connected like a string of pearls. The spirit and intent of the program should be retained throughout. There should be neither too little or too much, neither needless loops nor useless variables, neither lack of structure nor overwhelming rigidity." - The Tao of Programming, 4.1 - Geoffrey James My blog: Imperial Deltronics	[reply]
Re^6: Plea for upvotes. by karlgoethebier (Abbot) on Sep 03, 2013 at 09:13 UTC
"so what was exactly the problem?" Good question. Seems that it's getting forensic. So what is going on here? A factual explanation for the non-gods, non private eyes, mere mortals et al. would be helpful. It would also be helpful to keep in mind that there are non native speakers around here that might miss some presuppositions as well as sarcasm. Thanks and regards, Karl ŤThe Crux of the Biscuit is the Apostropheť	[reply]
Re^7: Plea for upvotes. by hdb (Monsignor) on Sep 03, 2013 at 09:41 UTC
Comment from Hibb de Bach: that was sarcasm... UPDATE: As pointed out by karlgoethebier in his reply, I need to add some explanation. Here is some introduction into the local language http://ckprojects.org/frankforderisch.pdf.	[reply] [d/l]
Re^8: Plea for upvotes. by karlgoethebier (Abbot) on Sep 03, 2013 at 12:58 UTC
Re^8: Plea for upvotes. by karlgoethebier (Abbot) on Sep 03, 2013 at 19:07 UTC
Re^7: Plea for upvotes. by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Sep 03, 2013 at 09:34 UTC
So what is going on here? Nothing. I made it all up because I'm an attention seeker that contributes nothing here.	[reply]