RE: Layers within tables
by neshura (Chaplain) on May 09, 2000 at 00:20 UTC
|
Right off hand, I can't say without seeing some code.
Why don't you post a snippet that's not working as expected?
Updated:
I am not seeing any problems using N4.7 on NT. IE 4.0 and N6
PR1 are another story -- the code totally doesn't work.
From what I can see, your test case is trying to build an
outer table
with a grey background. The nested table has a green cell,
a cell containing a red inlined layer, and a blue cell.
Well, I played around with your code, added some more
layers, an ode to hunger, and some table attributes. They
work absolutely fine -- but only in N4.7.
restating common knowledge... Layer behavior is browser specific which requires that
you use *groan* javascript to autodetect and write the
correct tags if you are coding for a general audience. I don't know if IE 5 supports external doc loading for
layers but I know that 4.0 does not. LAYER and ILAYER usually
work as expected under Netscape (pour moi), so I am unable to guess where your
errors are coming from... (Netscape under Linux? Some other
weird and kray-Z browser/OS combo?)
e-mail neshura | [reply] |
Re: Layers within tables
by johncoswell (Acolyte) on May 09, 2000 at 02:45 UTC
|
| [reply] |
|
Hi,
Want to add a problem to that DynAPI.
It's not platform-independent!!
Ugly/not working on Mac/linux.
Well some things work a believe but not all and I feel(also in programming perl) that it should try to be platform-independent.
Don't know how you all feel. Maybe some reactions??
UPDATE:
ILAYER is a tag that is not used anymore. The best to use is to use div and css. And be on the watch it works on all platforms.
Working with layers is something that should be avoided becauce they're the main raison why websites don't look the same or are viewable by all platforms!!
| [reply] |
Re: Layers within tables
by Russ (Deacon) on May 09, 2000 at 02:15 UTC
|
After crashing Netscrape (4.07), the next time I tried it, it worked just fine.
My question for you: why are you using an ilayer? I assume you are intending to do DHTML stuff with it... If not, just use <div> or <span> to get your W3C-compliant attributes set.
I am currently involved in a HEAVILY DHTML-ized website for a promotional materials/printing company in Fort Smith, AR. Having dealt wit DHTML in Netscrape and Exploder, I have to say, "I hate Netscape!" Exploder has its problems, but for DHTML it is basically just downright nice... Standardization will help tremendously, of course.
Anyway, back to the issue at hand...;-)
"Layers in tables" has always been a shaky proposition, at best, in Netscrape. Our experience says you *must* use <layer> (or <ilayer>) calls to have any hope of it working, and even then, good luck.
Russ
| [reply] |
Re: Layers within tables
by Russ (Deacon) on May 09, 2000 at 02:13 UTC
|
After crashing Netscrape (4.07), the next time I tried it, it worked just fine.
My question for you: why are you using an ilayer? I assume you are intending to do DHTML stuff with it... If not, just use or to get your W3C-compliant attributes set.
I am currently involved in a HEAVILY DHTML-ized website for a promotional materials/printing company in Fort Smith, AR. Having dealt wit DHTML in Netscrape and Exploder, I have to say, "I hate Netscape!" Exploder has its problems, but for DHTML it is basically just downright nice... Standardization will help tremendously, of course.
Anyway, back to the issue at hand...;-)
"Layers in tables" has always been a shaky proposition, at best, in Netscrape. Our experience says you *must* use <layer> (or <ilayer>) calls to have any hope of it working, and even then, good luck.
Russ
| [reply] |
|
Argh! I missed a couple conversions of <'s and >'s.
Kindly remove, please?
It's hosed enough to prevent me from editing it myself :-(
Thanks, Russ
| [reply] |
RE: Layers within tables
by Anonymous Monk on May 09, 2000 at 13:34 UTC
|
| [reply] |
Re: Layers within tables
by mr_ayo (Beadle) on May 09, 2000 at 01:49 UTC
|
This seems to depend on the browser.
Using Netscape 4.08 your example rendered just fine with both tables in place.
Using IE 5.5 the example choked even with only one table.
Using IE 5 the example worked fine.
Sounds like you need to find something a little more reliable. | [reply] |