Re: Multi-stage flip-flop?

I don't understand, your first example looks wrong.

With Flip/flops the borders are inclusive, i.e. the second condition wouldn't be evaluated if the start still belongs to the first condition.

Cheers Rolf

_{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language and ☆☆☆☆ :)}

Comment on Re: Multi-stage flip-flop?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Multi-stage flip-flop? by RonW (Parson) on Dec 10, 2014 at 23:46 UTC
I didn't say that it worked. Only that I wrote it Anyway, is an example of why multi-stage flip-flops would be a useful enhancement.	[reply]
Re^3: Multi-stage flip-flop? by LanX (Saint) on Dec 10, 2014 at 23:58 UTC
Please try to give an example highlighting what you mean. Cheers Rolf _{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language and ☆☆☆☆ :)}	[reply]
Re^4: Multi-stage flip-flop? by RonW (Parson) on Dec 11, 2014 at 00:13 UTC
Reworded the description after the second example and modified the second example for clarity.	[reply]