in reply to Re^3: Bidirectional lookup algorithm? (Updated: further info.)
in thread Bidirectional lookup algorithm? (Updated: further info.)

This node falls below the community's minimum standard of quality and will not be displayed.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: Bidirectional lookup algorithm? (Updated: further info.)
by Your Mother (Archbishop) on Jul 28, 2017 at 19:24 UTC

    Personally, I don't actually believe you to be stupid. You are, however, the laziest monk who has ever had long term participation here; quite easily. And that married to your out of date, half-baked skills, absolute lack of Perl chops, and braggadocio begins to make you the most odious monk who has ever had long term participation.

Re^5: Bidirectional lookup algorithm? (Updated: further info.)
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Jan 06, 2015 at 19:24 UTC
    Thank you for calling me “lazy” and “dumb!”

    That just reinforces both my points perfectly.

    What I actually wrote was: "you're either too lazy to read them properly; or too dumb to understand them.". That you are too lazy to read what I actually wrote comes as no surprise.

    Any programmer would know that A|B is not equivalent to A & B. That you do not understand also comes as no surprise at all.

    But, if the cap fits, and your illogic allows you to accept A & B; you're most welcome!


    With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
    Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
    "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
    In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.