in reply to Re^2: Size of Judy::HS array: where is MemUsed()?
in thread Size of Judy::HS array: where is MemUsed()?

I think maybe you were misled by the wording of "This implementation is not supplied by libJudy". I read it as "while other functions in this package are simple wrappers around functions provided by the external library, this function I wrote myself".

In the event, that looks like a useful warning: it seems quite possible that the external library is solid, and that the simple wrappers do indeed simply wrap. In which case you may well get entirely reliable behaviour with those, even if the additional functionality added by the author is less solid.

In any case I've added the patch as a ticket on Judy's queue, so it's there if you need it: id=147637.

  • Comment on Re^3: Size of Judy::HS array: where is MemUsed()?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Size of Judy::HS array: where is MemUsed()?
by kcott (Archbishop) on Apr 08, 2023 at 15:20 UTC
    "I think maybe you were misled by the wording ..."

    That's entirely possible; thanks for the follow-up.

    This has left me feeling somewhat more confident about the Judy modules than I was earlier today. As per "Re^2: Size of Judy::HS array: where is MemUsed()?", I may be able to avoid MemUsed() entirely; but thanks for the patch anyway. Also from that same node, I'll be picking up from where I left off after Easter.

    — Ken