in reply to Who still uses the camel book?

The nature of the technical book industry has changed a lot over the years. Humungous reference tomes, like Programming Perl and The C++ Programming Language, have become relics of a different age, with their reference material more conveniently looked up online nowadays.

Though ebook versions may still be viable, these old-fashioned mega tomes are too heavy to carry around, plus you would need (prohibitively expensive) hardback versions to comfortably read them in your study.

Slim, boutique books with small print runs, such as the excellent Modern Perl by chromatic, still appear to be economically viable. At least, I recently bought a physical copy of the 254-page A Tour of C++ (2022) and enjoy reading it in bed (reading physical books in bed is less likely to harm sleep patterns than reading on an electronic tablet) ... while I never open the mega tome The C++ Programming Language any more.

From my mandatory Perl Book Links reference, my favourite Perl book nowadays is Modern Perl by chromatic.

Update: might be interesting to compare the answers in this node to these two nodes from 2007:

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Who still uses the camel book?
by starX (Chaplain) on Jul 11, 2023 at 16:02 UTC

    I oddly enough remember vrk's node from way back when; my internet access was somewhat spotty in those days, and I was running freebsd on a toshiba libretto as my main machine, and honest to goodness reference books were incredibly useful. But it's been at least a decade since I've used any of those books for anything other than decorations.

    But I take your point about the slim books with limited scope. I have purchased a number of those in recent years to learn a new language feature or something like that. But I also don't tend to hang on to those in the same way that I did the camel, the K&R, or Advanced Programming in the Unix Environment.

Re^2: Who still uses the camel book?
by mldvx4 (Friar) on Aug 20, 2023 at 16:56 UTC

    I still use Programming Perl. I have had several editions and the 4th is on my main shelf. I still use it for looking things up. I have been getting better at searching through the manual pages, perlrun(1), perlfunc(1), and so on. However when I need / want to browse or have to study something, then that book comes off the shelf. It's just that it's a little heavy, which I guess is the cost of so much material being covered.

      I've gotten so used to it that I forgot to mention it above, but I've cut thumb indexes into the 4th edition to mark a few of the sections, especially the functions and regular expression sections. That has helped very much dealing with the overall physical size.

Re^2: Who still uses the camel book?
by cavac (Prior) on Aug 22, 2023 at 09:46 UTC

    The main printed book i still use on a semi-regular basis is my hardcover of Tannenbaums "Operating Systems, Design and Implementation, Third Edition". While i don't design operating systems, it's incredibly handy to look up stuff like the "Dining Philosophers Problem" and other stuff relating to interprocess communication.

    PerlMonks XP is useless? Not anymore: XPD - Do more with your PerlMonks XP