Re^2: RFC: Export tags for builtin pragma

++ Thanks for the feedback.

None of those tag names are set in stone. I'm certainly open to suggestions for alternatives.

For your point 1, maybe:

For point 2, I wasn't entirely sold on :round myself but couldn't think of anything better. Perhaps await suggestions from others.

— Ken

Comment on Re^2: RFC: Export tags for builtin pragma

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: RFC: Export tags for builtin pragma by swl (Prior) on Oct 19, 2023 at 20:42 UTC
Maybe `:numeric` instead of `:round`? That provides some future proofing in the event functions like `looks_like_number` are added at a later date. Although maybe that causes issues as then different module versions would load different subs.	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^4: RFC: Export tags for builtin pragma by kcott (Archbishop) on Oct 20, 2023 at 15:38 UTC
G'day swl, ++ Thanks for your suggestion. If `builtin::round` were added, I think that would still be suitable for `:round`. If `builtin::looks_like_number` were added, that might go in `:numeric`; however, perhaps `:string` would be better (and could include `built::trim`). I feel like I've opened a can of worms and they're all escaping in different directions. 🥫 🪱 ↖️ 🪱 ↗️ 🪱 ↘️ 🪱 ↙️ — Ken	[reply] [d/l] [select]