Re^2: SO and AI

I respect you very much, but I must call you out.

I suspect that SO probably is selling it with due attribution.

I beg you to qualify or quantify that statement with viable examples.

Comment on Re^2: SO and AI

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: SO and AI by hippo (Archbishop) on May 20, 2024 at 11:09 UTC
That is my suspicion simply because it would be a lot easier for them to do it that way than the other. Additionally, the purchaser might also prefer that as it would allow their bot to follow the conversation better in comments/replies. eg. if a reply says "foobar's answer is wrong because they haven't considered the baz effect" then it's only useful if you know which reply was foobar's in the first place. That said, given the poor quality of output from LLM-based AI they probably won't even bother with that. 🦛	[reply]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^3: SO and AI
by hippo (Archbishop) on May 20, 2024 at 11:09 UTC

That is my suspicion simply because it would be a lot easier for them to do it that way than the other. Additionally, the purchaser might also prefer that as it would allow their bot to follow the conversation better in comments/replies. eg. if a reply says "foobar's answer is wrong because they haven't considered the baz effect" then it's only useful if you know which reply was foobar's in the first place.

That said, given the poor quality of output from LLM-based AI they probably won't even bother with that.

🦛

[reply]