in reply to Recursively substitute against multidimensional hash

Something like this? No eval necessary.

use warnings; use strict; sub dive { my ($r, @p) = @_; return unless @p; unshift @p, 'default' if @p==1; $r = ref $r eq 'HASH' && exists $$r{$_} ? $$r{$_} : return for + @p; return $r } my %var = ( default => { foo => 'Default-Foo' }, foo => { bar => 'Foo-Bar' }, a => { deeply => { nested => { value => 'A-Deeply-Nested-Value +' } } }, ); my $work = <<'EOF'; Hello, %foo Blah, %foo.bar Deep: %a.deeply.nested.value EOF print $work =~ s{ % ( \w+ (?:\.\w+)* ) }{ dive \%var, split /\./, $1 } +xegr; __END__ Hello, Default-Foo Blah, Foo-Bar Deep: A-Deeply-Nested-Value

This is based on my node here. I also have similar code linked from my scratchpad in the bullet point "Data::Diver type code".

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Recursively substitute against multidimensional hash
by Maelstrom (Beadle) on Feb 14, 2025 at 10:16 UTC
    Thanks for that but can I ask a hypothetical question? If the hash I was using was not %var but $self-{'VAR'} where $self is a blessed object reference and the original code which had been edited for clarity actually looked like
    $work =~ s{%(\w+)(?:\.(\w+))?}{ defined $2 ? $self->{'VARS'}{$1}{$2} : $self->{'VARS'}{default}{$1} }eg;
    How would one call your dive function in this hypothetical case? Because I've tried
    my $fml = $self->{'VARS'}; $work =~ s{ % ( \w+ (?:\.\w+)* ) }{ dive($fml, split /\./, $1) }xegr;
    and even $fml = \%{$self->{'VARS'}}; but not substitution is happening despite cut'n'pasting from your example code which is working fine in another windowd. NGL this is a humiliating way to stumble at the finish line yet here I am.
      Nevermind it wasn't the reference it was that sneaky little /r at the end of the regexp that was changing my functions behaviour.
        Nevermind it wasn't the reference it was that sneaky little /r at the end of the regexp that was changing my functions behaviour.

        Note I would have never been able to guess that from the code you showed, which is why a Short, Self-Contained, Correct Example is so important, like I showed in my reply above.