in reply to Re^2: Listing dependencies for Perl modules--should even the common ones get listed?
in thread Listing dependencies for Perl modules--should even the common ones get listed?

G'day etj,

That's a far more complicated Makefile.PL than I currently write; however, I can see some distinct benefits to using it.

I found ExtUtils::MakeMaker - META_MERGE which has some limited information. It doesn't mention {prereqs}{develop}{requires} or {prereqs}{runtime}{suggests}; I suspect there may be others.

Can you point me to a definitive reference for the META_MERGE key? Thankyou.

— Ken

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Listing dependencies for Perl modules--should even the common ones get listed?
by hippo (Archbishop) on Apr 06, 2025 at 09:50 UTC

      G'day hippo,

      ++ for the reference; and thanks again to etj for the original idea.

      This definitely seems like a better idea than splitting dependencies across Makefile.PL and README files. As well as my own personal modules, I maintain templates for these files for $work: I'll look at integrating META_MERGE during the next maintenance iteration.

      — Ken