Intrepid has asked for the wisdom of the Perl Monks concerning the following question:
I don't see a better place than SoPW at the Monastery to put this so I'll just dump it here and see what happens.
Just a simple inquiry: I just ran cpan (not cpanplus, which I post about a lot); I entered the command r for "reporting outdated/upgradeable modules" and cpan reported 92 unparseable module versions. Whoa. That makes me want to ask: is it really that difficult to write a package with a sane / parseable version? Or is cpan's programmatic notions of "parseable" odd or too strict? Opinions and knowledge welcomed.
Soren
Jul 05, 2025 at 17:47 UTCA just machine to make big decisions
Programmed by fellows (and gals) with compassion and vision
We'll be clean when their work is done
We'll be eternally free yes, and eternally young
Donald Fagen —> I.G.Y.
(Slightly modified for inclusiveness)
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re: Package VERSIONs not parseable by the cpan module
by choroba (Cardinal) on Jul 05, 2025 at 18:10 UTC | |
by Intrepid (Curate) on Jul 08, 2025 at 16:56 UTC |