in reply to Re^2: How do I go from procedural to object oriented programming?
in thread How do I go from procedural to object oriented programming?

One of the benefits of OO is being able to organize your thoughts and design your solution. OO tends to persuade the coder to not just bash out a bunch of code, but instead plan and refactor. What you did was post 7 nodes of stream-of-thought off the top of your head consciousness without bothering to write a rough draft and refactor your repeated thoughts. Very non-OO.
  • Comment on Re^3: How do I go from procedural to object oriented programming?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: How do I go from procedural to object oriented programming?
by Anonymous Monk on May 07, 2015 at 02:30 UTC

    One of the benefits of OO is being able to organize your thoughts and design your solution. OO tends to persuade the coder to not just bash out a bunch of code, but instead plan and refactor. What you did was post 7 nodes of stream-of-thought off the top of your head consciousness without bothering to write a rough draft and refactor your repeated thoughts. Very non-OO.

    And very much appreciated.

    Compared to just blobs of code almost everybody always posts , watching somebody go through their thinking process is very much appreciated -- its practically priceless.

    How the fuck can you complain about that?

    You can't skip steps and arrive at a solution and understand why you got there and why its good